NARS Little Princess Lipstick ($ 26.00 for zero.12 oz) is a pale pink peach with a glowing end. It had a semi-transparent pigmentation, however the shade utilized erratically, clustered on itself and collapsed closely in every line of the lip that I had (and a few that I didn’t know that I had!). The consistency was mild, skinny with out being cheesy and comfy to use and put on, however the product appeared so mediocre. This shadow remained on for 2 and a half hours and felt barely moisturizing when worn.
Sephora Sink or Swim (67) (P, $ eight.00) is extra shimmery, darker, colder (90% related) .MAC Tease Maker (LE, $ 19.50) is extra shimmery, darker (90% Comparable) .City Decay Gubby (P, $ 18.00) is extra shimmering, much less shiny (90% related) .MAC Love a Gamble (LE, $ 19.50) is extra shimmery, lighter, hotter (90% related). Too Confronted Angel Tears (LE, $ 22.00) is extra shimmery, lighter (90% related) .MAC Pet Me Please (LE, $ 19.50) is brighter, brighter (85% related). Tom Magnificence Ford (P, $ 36.00) is lighter, hotter (85% related) .Sephora Pink Lollipop (109) (P, $ 14.00) is extra shimmery, quieter, hotter (85% related) ). Tom Magnificence Magnificence Carine (LE, $ 36.00) is extra shimmery, hotter (85% related).
Preview of the formulation
$ 26.00 / zero.12 oz. – $ 216.67 per ounce
NARS has reformulated its primary vary of lipsticks, which now contains 72 shades divided into three finishes: matte, pure and satin. The formulation is meant to go "gently and evenly with a lightweight really feel" that’s "lengthy lasting" and "bleeding and feather resistant". The clear end has "a refined and clear shade that shines", whereas the satin end has a "creamy wealthy shade" and the matte end an "intense shade with a velvety end".
The matte end has a really skinny featherweight really feel, however they didn’t really feel too sticky or too prone to slip throughout utility, though they positively have a firmer texture within the tube. The inclusion of dimethicone (the primary ingredient within the matte end) offered a easy, velvety floor look, however was not as powdery as a number of the different extra dense silicone matte lipstick formulation printed previously. final two years. Most shades had been pigmented and nearly opaque to opaque. The wear and tear ranged from three to 6 hours with deeper and richer shades remaining a bit longer and leaving slight stains. They had been comfy to put on however felt like they didn’t dry out, somewhat than being notably moisturizing.
The satin end has extra slippage, appears to be like thicker (though not likely thick or heavy) in comparison with the matte end, and naturally, there was a refined to slight sheen / shine. They utilized easily, comfortably and more often than not, they had been uniform and didn’t penetrate perceptibly into the lips, however there was some variance between the shades. They had been usually semi-opaque to opaque on the quilt with a barely moisturizing put on of 4 to 6 hours.
The sheer end had protection starting from semi-pure to medium protection, however most had some translucency, giving them an ideal end. I discovered that many of the shades that I attempted had been buildable to a sure extent. The feel was a bit firmer, however they felt extra emollient and "melted" a bit extra in opposition to my lips than I keep in mind the unique line of lipsticks. Some shades utilized effectively with uniform utility and flattered, however some sank extra clearly into the traces of my lips. This end tended to put on between three and 5 hours.
I should not have lots of authentic NARS lipsticks in my hiding place (I’ve particularly daring as a result of they haven’t come out a lot within the base vary) to match. The matte end was noticeably thinner, duller and had a extra velvety look on the lips in comparison with the unique which had a refined sheen. The satin end appeared a bit extra pigmented and never as vivid / shiny because the earlier formulation, whereas the clear end was creamier, extra emollient and simpler to use. It didn’t appear to be a really totally different formulation, however it was a bit simpler to make use of (smoother, extra emollient, however nonetheless lighter and thinner, lots much less slippery than every other Audacious vary) and extra comfy to make use of. put on in all places. for me.
I didn’t discover any scent or style, though there may be "perfume" listed within the substances – it smelled impartial, not waxy however I simply didn’t have any fragrance.
Browse all our NARS lipstick samples.
substances
To be taught extra, click on on the hyperlink under. Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil, Passiflora Edulis Seed Oil, Sodium Hyaluronate, Tocopherol, Tocopheryl Acetate, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Diethylhexyl Sulfamate, Caprylyl Glycol, [+/- ( May Contain): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Blue 1 Lake (Ci 42090), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491), Red 6 (Ci 15850), Red 7 Lake (Ci 15850)].
NARS Sexual Cealing Lipstick ($ 26.00 for zero.12 oz) is a medium mild pink with heat, sturdy shades and a tremendous multicolored pearl (largely rose and gold) with a pure sheen. He had a semi-transparent shade cowl that could possibly be constructed to medium protection – he truly appeared very "very-my-lips-but-better" (he appears extra pigmented on my precise lips than I actually assume). The feel was mild, emollient with out being too slippery and comfy to put on with a wonderful utility. It lasted three hours on me and felt moisturizing over time.
Chunk Magnificence Rose ice cream (P, $ 24.00) is much less good (90% similarity) .MAC Sundown Rose (LE, $ 19.50) is much less shimmery (90% similarity). Tom Ford Whitney Magnificence (LE, $ 36.00) is quieter, colder (90% related) .NARS Summer time Hearth (LE, $ 28.00) is much less good, much less good (85% related). Revlon Demure (P, $ eight.49) is much less good, hotter (85% related). Pat Nath Kiss Kiss (P, $ 40.00) is much less shiny, darker, extra pigmented (much like 85%). Pat McGrath Nude Romantic (P, $ 40.00) is much less vivid, darker (at 85%) .MAC Skew (P, $ 19.50) is much less vivid, cooler (85% related) .YSL Nu Deadly ( 85) (P, 36.00 $) is much less good, darker, much less shiny (85% related) .NARS Immediate Crush (P, 26.00 $) is much less shiny, darker, extra pigmented (80% related) .
Preview of the formulation
$ 26.00 / zero.12 oz. – $ 216.67 per ounce
NARS has reformulated its primary vary of lipsticks, which now contains 72 shades divided into three finishes: matte, pure and satin. The formulation is meant to go "gently and evenly with a lightweight really feel" that’s "lengthy lasting" and "bleeding and feather resistant". The clear end has "a refined and clear shade that shines", whereas the satin end has a "creamy wealthy shade" and the matte end an "intense shade with a velvety end".
The matte end has a really skinny featherweight really feel, however they didn’t really feel too sticky or too prone to slip throughout utility, though they positively have a firmer texture within the tube. The inclusion of dimethicone (the primary ingredient within the matte end) offered a easy, velvety floor look, however was not as powdery as a number of the different extra dense silicone matte lipstick formulation printed previously. final two years. Most shades had been pigmented and nearly opaque to opaque. The wear and tear ranged from three to 6 hours with deeper and richer shades remaining a bit longer and leaving slight stains. They had been comfy to put on however felt like they didn’t dry out, somewhat than being notably moisturizing.
The satin end has extra slippage, appears to be like thicker (though not likely thick or heavy) in comparison with the matte end, and naturally, there was a refined to slight sheen / shine. They utilized easily, comfortably and more often than not, they had been uniform and didn’t penetrate perceptibly into the lips, however there was some variance between the shades. They had been usually semi-opaque to opaque on the quilt with a barely moisturizing put on of 4 to 6 hours.
The sheer end had protection starting from semi-pure to medium protection, however most had some translucency, giving them an ideal end. I discovered that many of the shades that I attempted had been buildable to a sure extent. The feel was a bit firmer, however they felt extra emollient and "melted" a bit extra in opposition to my lips than I keep in mind the unique line of lipsticks. Some shades utilized effectively with uniform utility and flattered, however some sank extra clearly into the traces of my lips. This end tended to put on between three and 5 hours.
I should not have lots of authentic NARS lipsticks in my hiding place (I’ve particularly daring as a result of they haven’t come out a lot within the base vary) to match. The matte end was noticeably thinner, duller and had a extra velvety look on the lips in comparison with the unique which had a refined sheen. The satin end appeared a bit extra pigmented and never as vivid / shiny because the earlier formulation, whereas the clear end was creamier, extra emollient and simpler to use. It didn’t appear to be a really totally different formulation, however it was a bit simpler to make use of (smoother, extra emollient, however nonetheless lighter and thinner, lots much less slippery than every other Audacious vary) and extra comfy to make use of. put on in all places. for me.
I didn’t discover any scent or style, though there may be "perfume" listed within the substances – it smelled impartial, not waxy however I simply didn’t have any fragrance.
Browse all our NARS lipstick samples.
substances
To be taught extra, click on on the hyperlink under. Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil, Passiflora Edulis Seed Oil, Sodium Hyaluronate, Tocopherol, Tocopheryl Acetate, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Diethylhexyl Sulfamate, Caprylyl Glycol, [+/- ( May Contain): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Blue 1 Lake (Ci 42090), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491), Red 6 (Ci 15850), Red 7 Lake (Ci 15850)].
NARS Chelsea Ladies Lipstick ($ 26.00 for zero.12 oz) is a pale pink coral, barely pale, with a pure sheen. It had a semi-transparent cowl, which corresponded to the expectations based mostly on the ultimate rating, which utilized uniformly to the lips. There was a small quantity of product that sank in my deeper traces of the lips, however was not noticeable at a traditional viewing distance. Though the consistency is barely emollient and good, it required freshly exfoliated lips or a catchy texture. It’s effectively worn for 3 hours and is barely hydrated with time.
NARS License to Love (P, $ 26.00) is extra shimmery, lighter, brighter (90% related) .Burberry Clementine (261) (P, $ 34.00) is extra shimmery, darker, hotter ( 90% related). Lotus Lotus Flower (P, $ 65.00) is brighter, darker, hotter (90% related). Tom Magnificence Magnificence Scorching (LE, $ 55.00) is lighter, hotter (90% related) .MAC French Silk (P, $ 19.00) is brighter, darker (90% related). Colibri Hummingbird (P, $ 65.00) is extra shimmery, lighter (85% related). NARS (LE,) lip balm is darker, hotter, much less shiny (much like 85%) .NARS Barbarella (P, $ 26.00) is darker, hotter (85% related) .MAC See Sheer (P, $ 19.50) is extra shimmery, darker (85% related) .Tom Ford Magnificence Lustrous (LE, $ 55.00) is darker, hotter (85% related)) .
Preview of the formulation
$ 26.00 / zero.12 oz. – $ 216.67 per ounce
NARS has reformulated its primary vary of lipsticks, which now contains 72 shades divided into three finishes: matte, pure and satin. The formulation is meant to go "gently and evenly with a lightweight really feel" that’s "lengthy lasting" and "bleeding and feather resistant". The clear end has "a refined and clear shade that shines", whereas the satin end has a "creamy wealthy shade" and the matte end an "intense shade with a velvety end".
The matte end has a really skinny featherweight really feel, however they didn’t really feel too sticky or too prone to slip throughout utility, though they positively have a firmer texture within the tube. The inclusion of dimethicone (the primary ingredient within the matte end) offered a easy, velvety floor look, however was not as powdery as a number of the different extra dense silicone matte lipstick formulation printed previously. final two years. Most shades had been pigmented and nearly opaque to opaque. The wear and tear ranged from three to 6 hours with deeper and richer shades remaining a bit longer and leaving slight stains. They had been comfy to put on however felt like they didn’t dry out, somewhat than being notably moisturizing.
The satin end has extra slippage, appears to be like thicker (though not likely thick or heavy) in comparison with the matte end, and naturally, there was a refined to slight sheen / shine. They utilized easily, comfortably and more often than not, they had been uniform and didn’t penetrate perceptibly into the lips, however there was some variance between the shades. They had been usually semi-opaque to opaque on the quilt with a barely moisturizing put on of 4 to 6 hours.
The sheer end had protection starting from semi-pure to medium protection, however most had some translucency, giving them an ideal end. I discovered that many of the shades that I attempted had been buildable to a sure extent. The feel was a bit firmer, however they felt extra emollient and "melted" a bit extra in opposition to my lips than I keep in mind the unique line of lipsticks. Some shades utilized effectively with uniform utility and flattered, however some sank extra clearly into the traces of my lips. This end tended to put on between three and 5 hours.
I should not have lots of authentic NARS lipsticks in my hiding place (I’ve particularly daring as a result of they haven’t come out a lot within the base vary) to match. The matte end was noticeably thinner, duller and had a extra velvety look on the lips in comparison with the unique which had a refined sheen. The satin end appeared a bit extra pigmented and never as vivid / shiny because the earlier formulation, whereas the clear end was creamier, extra emollient and simpler to use. It didn’t appear to be a really totally different formulation, however it was a bit simpler to make use of (smoother, extra emollient, however nonetheless lighter and thinner, lots much less slippery than every other Audacious vary) and extra comfy to make use of. put on in all places. for me.
I didn’t discover any scent or style, though there may be "perfume" listed within the substances – it smelled impartial, not waxy however I simply didn’t have any fragrance.
Browse all our NARS lipstick samples.
substances
To be taught extra, click on on the hyperlink under. Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil, Passiflora Edulis Seed Oil, Sodium Hyaluronate, Tocopherol, Tocopheryl Acetate, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Diethylhexyl Sulfamate, Caprylyl Glycol, [+/- ( May Contain): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Blue 1 Lake (Ci 42090), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491), Red 6 (Ci 15850), Red 7 Lake (Ci 15850)].
Leave a comment