Tom Ford Duo Illuminating Incandescent Pores and skin Assessment & Swatches

By henma1 June 30, 2019 0

Incandescent

Tom Ford Magnificence Incandescent Pores and skin Illumination Duo ($ 80.00 for zero.42 oz) is a brand new, completely growing duo with heat pale gold and a richer, hotter plum. Each shades had good pigmentation, have been fusible and lengthy sporting. It was per the previous duos of the model on this formulation.

Incandescent (Excessive)

Incandescent (Excessive) is a candy gold with hotter shades and a luminous shine. It had an nearly opaque pigmentation with a denser, firmer consistency, clean to the contact, however utilized evenly and superbly blended. Its gel-powder formulation is ideal for dense brushes and average hand, however the product is exceptionally nice on the pores and skin and its shiny end doesn’t improve the pure texture of my pores and skin. He was effective for eight and a half hours on me earlier than I observed an attenuation.

City Decay Bliss (LE, $ 26.00) is extra shimmering (just like 95%) .NARS Fort de France (P, $ 38.00) is extra shimmery (95% related). Colour Pop Boujee Name (P, $ eight.00) is extra shimmering (95% Champagne Method (Physics Champagne) (P, $ 10.99) is extra shimmery, darker (90% related) .Looxi Magnificence Bombshell (P, $ 7.50) is extra shimmery, hotter (90% related) Marc Jacobs Magnificence Dew You (P, $ 45.00) is much less shimmery, darker (90% related colour) .Color Pop A smile and a Tune (LE, $ eight.00) is extra shimmering (90% resemblance.) Tom Ford's Magnificence Sky (LE, $ 50.00) is darker (90% resemblance) .Moist "Wild Wild Earth" ( LE, $ 6.99) is brighter, brighter (90% related) Soften Cosmetics Stargazer (P, $ 39.00) is darker, hotter (90% related). Tom Ford Beauty Luminous Powder Incandescent (below) Tom Ford Magnificence Luminous Powder Incandescent (under) Tom Ford Magnificence Luminous Powder Incandescent (under) Tom Ford Magnificence Luminous Powder Incandescent (under) Tom Ford Magnificence Luminous Powder Incandescent (under)

Incandescent (backside)

Incandescent (backside) is a reasonably darkish plum with heat undertones and a metallic end. It had an opaque pigmentation of clean consistency, reasonably dense, devoid of dusting however remaining melting on the pores and skin. The trick of the sort of formulation (hybrid gel-powder) is that it requires a denser brush to select up the product evenly, though I don’t name it laborious to work as a result of the powder continues to soften nearly on the pores and skin. for a seamless end. It was properly worn for eight and a half hours on me earlier than fading appreciably.

Dior Plum Pop (11) (LE, $ 48.00) is much less shimmering, darker, cooler (90% related) .MAC Marvel Years (LE,) is much less shimmering (90% related) .NARS Lovejoy (P, $ 30.00) is much less shimmering, darker, hotter (just like 90%) .Fenty Magnificence Moscow Mule (PiP, $ 36.00) is extra shimmery, hotter (90% related). Shiseido Berry Daybreak (08) (P, $ 29.00) is much less shimmery, darker, colder (90% related) .Tarte Tempo (-,) is extra shimmery (90% related) .Laura Geller Pink Butter Cream (P, $ 28.00) is lighter, brisker (85% related) .Anastasia Taffy (LE,) is lighter (85% related)) .Lancome Rosegold Lights (P, $ 30.00) is much less sensible, extra mild (85% related) .NARS Isadora (LE, $ 30.00) is much less sensible, colder (85% related).